Sunday, October 25, 2015
The Last Page of Maus
In class I was suprised when we didn't really discuss the last page of the comic, as the last page of most literary works are very important in the context of the whole story. I thought this blog post would be a good opportunity to share my thoughts on the last page.
The ending of Maus fails to give closure, leaving numerous questions unanswered. The reason why Vladek calls Art Richieu is unknown and has many reasonable explanations. It could mean that Art hasn't lived up to the expectations that Richieu had left when he died, or that Vladek actually begins to accept Art as a son by allowing him to replace Richieu in his life. Alternatively, it could also mean that Vladek hasn't escaped the past and is still actively living in it. Or, most simply, it could just be a slip of tongue and indicate Vladek's advanced age and the memory loss he underwent.
The gravestone at the bottom of the page has the same effect. While it literally splits the last two panels, it also seems to wrap the whole story together, putting Vladek's and Anja's name next to each other, indicating that the couple "lived happy, happy ever after" (136). However, the conditions of death for both Vladek and Anja would seem to indicate an unhappy ending instead. This, perhaps, may be sending the message that the Holocaust never will have a "happy ending". Still, the tombstone adds to the confusion and lack of clarity presented by the last page.
The signature at the bottom of the page is a last word of sorts for Art Spiegelman. The fact that it is Art's signature rather than Vladek's implys that the story is now Art's, not Vladek's. Art has taken over the responsibility of the story and thus carries the guilt that comes with it. Alternatively, writing the story could also be a channel for Art to release his guilt, a catharsis of sorts. Even more, the date at next to Art's signature is 13 years, the age when a Jewish child to becomes a man. This suggests that Art finally became a man after writing the comic, as if writing this book ushered in a new and better age for Art.
The last page of Maus truly lacks the closure that so many other novels contain. Overall, the lack of closure suggests that, like this comic, the true stories of the Holocaust lack closure - nothing good came out of the Holocaust. The rare good from the Holocaust, under closer investigation, must have a larger negative that outweighs the positive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that the ending of Maus is pretty open ended and that some things remain unanswered. However, I think that the last page does give some closure, in the sense that Art has taken his father's story as his own and that his father finally got a catharsis from telling his story.
ReplyDeleteHey Richard,
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with the utter paradox of this page, if not the whole book. Right when you feel like you understand the motive of the author, he completely spins the narrative to make you feel otherwise. Until now, I felt like I couldn't truly understand why he would create such a nonlinear linear narrative, but after your closer observation of it, I feel like I can try and pick the book apart for the first time since I opened it. Thank you for your insights on this utterly inexplicable work of art.
~Vineet Kamat